Differences in Prescribing Rates of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Between Spinal Cord Injured and Non-Spinal Cord Injured Individuals: A Retrospective Study.

Thatte S, Oleson CV, Haberman J, Burke S, Al Arabia DH, Wilson JR.

Open source

DOI
10.46292/sci25-00066
Published
2026-08-10
Container
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.46292/sci25-00066,
  title = {Differences in Prescribing Rates of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Between Spinal Cord Injured and Non-Spinal Cord Injured Individuals: A Retrospective Study.},
  author = {Thatte S and  Oleson CV and  Haberman J and  Burke S and  Al Arabia DH and  Wilson JR.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil},
  doi = {10.46292/sci25-00066},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.46292/sci25-00066}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Differences in Prescribing Rates of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Between Spinal Cord Injured and Non-Spinal Cord Injured Individuals: A Retrospective Study.
AU  - Thatte S
AU  -  Oleson CV
AU  -  Haberman J
AU  -  Burke S
AU  -  Al Arabia DH
AU  -  Wilson JR.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil
DO  - 10.46292/sci25-00066
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46292/sci25-00066
ER  - 

APA

S, T., CV, O., J, H., S, B., DH, A. A., & JR., W. (2026). Differences in Prescribing Rates of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Between Spinal Cord Injured and Non-Spinal Cord Injured Individuals: A Retrospective Study.. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.46292/sci25-00066

Source records