Do Mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited WoS publications better than average citation impact of journals (JCS)?
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.1507.02093
- Published
- 2015
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.48550/arxiv.1507.02093,
title = {Do Mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited WoS publications better than average citation impact of journals (JCS)?},
author = {Zahedi, Zohreh and Costas, Rodrigo and Wouters, Paul},
year = {2015},
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.1507.02093},
url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1507.02093}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Do Mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited WoS publications better than average citation impact of journals (JCS)? AU - Zahedi, Zohreh AU - Costas, Rodrigo AU - Wouters, Paul PY - 2015 DO - 10.48550/arxiv.1507.02093 UR - https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1507.02093 ER -
APA
Zohreh, Z., Rodrigo, C., & Paul, W. (2015). Do Mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited WoS publications better than average citation impact of journals (JCS)?. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1507.02093
Source records
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:26:26.976Z