What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2405.06563
- Published
- 2024
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.48550/arxiv.2405.06563,
title = {What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?},
author = {Kuznetsov, Ilia and Afzal, Osama Mohammed and Dercksen, Koen and Dycke, Nils and Goldberg, Alexander and Hope, Tom and Hovy, Dirk and Kummerfeld, Jonathan K. and Lauscher, Anne and Leyton-Brown, Kevin and Lu, Sheng and Mausam and Mieskes, Margot and Névéol, Aurélie and Pruthi, Danish and Qu, Lizhen and Schwartz, Roy and Smith, Noah A. and Solorio, Thamar and Wang, Jingyan and Zhu, Xiaodan and Rogers, Anna and Shah, Nihar B. and Gurevych, Iryna},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2405.06563},
url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.06563}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review? AU - Kuznetsov, Ilia AU - Afzal, Osama Mohammed AU - Dercksen, Koen AU - Dycke, Nils AU - Goldberg, Alexander AU - Hope, Tom AU - Hovy, Dirk AU - Kummerfeld, Jonathan K. AU - Lauscher, Anne AU - Leyton-Brown, Kevin AU - Lu, Sheng AU - Mausam AU - Mieskes, Margot AU - Névéol, Aurélie AU - Pruthi, Danish AU - Qu, Lizhen AU - Schwartz, Roy AU - Smith, Noah A. AU - Solorio, Thamar AU - Wang, Jingyan AU - Zhu, Xiaodan AU - Rogers, Anna AU - Shah, Nihar B. AU - Gurevych, Iryna PY - 2024 DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2405.06563 UR - https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.06563 ER -
APA
Ilia, K., Mohammed, A. O., Koen, D., Nils, D., Alexander, G., Tom, H., Dirk, H., K., K. J., Anne, L., Kevin, L., Sheng, L., Mausam, Margot, M., Aurélie, N., Danish, P., Lizhen, Q., Roy, S., A., S. N., Thamar, S., Jingyan, W., Xiaodan, Z., Anna, R., B., S. N., & Iryna, G. (2024). What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.06563
Source records
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:28:54.856Z