Using LLMs in Software Design: An Empirical Study of GitHub and A Practitioner Survey
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2605.01392
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.48550/arxiv.2605.01392,
title = {Using LLMs in Software Design: An Empirical Study of GitHub and A Practitioner Survey},
author = {Wang, Yifei and Li, Ruiyin and Liang, Peng and Cai, Yangxiao and Li, Zengyang and Shahin, Mojtaba and Khan, Arif Ali and Feng, Qiong},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.01392},
url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2605.01392}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Using LLMs in Software Design: An Empirical Study of GitHub and A Practitioner Survey AU - Wang, Yifei AU - Li, Ruiyin AU - Liang, Peng AU - Cai, Yangxiao AU - Li, Zengyang AU - Shahin, Mojtaba AU - Khan, Arif Ali AU - Feng, Qiong PY - 2026 DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.01392 UR - https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2605.01392 ER -
APA
Yifei, W., Ruiyin, L., Peng, L., Yangxiao, C., Zengyang, L., Mojtaba, S., Ali, K. A., & Qiong, F. (2026). Using LLMs in Software Design: An Empirical Study of GitHub and A Practitioner Survey. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2605.01392
Source records
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-27T04:05:35.374Z