Diagnostic performance of HyFoSy versus HSG for tubal patency: accuracy and agreement analysis.

Abdulqader SK, Nori W, Mohammed RA, Akram W, Akram NN

DOI: 10.5114/pjr/216144
Published: 2026
Container: Polish journal of radiology
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.5114/pjr/216144,
  title = {Diagnostic performance of HyFoSy versus HSG for tubal patency: accuracy and agreement analysis.},
  author = {Abdulqader SK and Nori W and Mohammed RA and Akram W and Akram NN},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Polish journal of radiology},
  doi = {10.5114/pjr/216144},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/216144}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Diagnostic performance of HyFoSy versus HSG for tubal patency: accuracy and agreement analysis.
AU  - Abdulqader SK
AU  - Nori W
AU  - Mohammed RA
AU  - Akram W
AU  - Akram NN
PY  - 2026
JO  - Polish journal of radiology
DO  - 10.5114/pjr/216144
UR  - https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/216144
ER  -

APA

SK, A., W, N., RA, M., W, A., & NN, A. (2026). Diagnostic performance of HyFoSy versus HSG for tubal patency: accuracy and agreement analysis.. Polish journal of radiology. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/216144

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:45:51.438Z