Re: Salvadó JA, Villena JM, Urrea F, et al. High-power holmium laser versus pulsed thulium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Results of a randomized prospective study. Cent European J Urol. 2026; 79: 30-35.
- DOI
- 10.5173/ceju.2026.0054
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Central European journal of urology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.5173/ceju.2026.0054,
title = {Re: Salvadó JA, Villena JM, Urrea F, et al. High-power holmium laser versus pulsed thulium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Results of a randomized prospective study. Cent European J Urol. 2026; 79: 30-35.},
author = {Chicaud M and Scilipoti P and Traxer O and Panthier F},
year = {2026},
journal = {Central European journal of urology},
doi = {10.5173/ceju.2026.0054},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2026.0054}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Re: Salvadó JA, Villena JM, Urrea F, et al. High-power holmium laser versus pulsed thulium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Results of a randomized prospective study. Cent European J Urol. 2026; 79: 30-35. AU - Chicaud M AU - Scilipoti P AU - Traxer O AU - Panthier F PY - 2026 JO - Central European journal of urology DO - 10.5173/ceju.2026.0054 UR - https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2026.0054 ER -
APA
M, C., P, S., O, T., & F, P. (2026). Re: Salvadó JA, Villena JM, Urrea F, et al. High-power holmium laser versus pulsed thulium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Results of a randomized prospective study. Cent European J Urol. 2026; 79: 30-35.. Central European journal of urology. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2026.0054
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T22:37:33.656Z