Peer Review Report For: Training strategies for the improvement of NATO Level 2 results for English Functional Level exams in the armed forces [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
- DOI
- 10.5256/f1000research.78069.r235911
- Published
- 2024-02-19
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- F1000 Research Ltd
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 58/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.5256/f1000research.78069.r235911,
title = {Peer Review Report For: Training strategies for the improvement of NATO Level 2 results for English Functional Level exams in the armed forces [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.5256/f1000research.78069.r235911},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.78069.r235911}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Peer Review Report For: Training strategies for the improvement of NATO Level 2 results for English Functional Level exams in the armed forces [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] PY - 2024 DO - 10.5256/f1000research.78069.r235911 UR - https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.78069.r235911 ER -
APA
Peer Review Report For: Training strategies for the improvement of NATO Level 2 results for English Functional Level exams in the armed forces [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. (2024). https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.78069.r235911
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-05T22:45:32.953Z