Anchor Theory, Rebar Theory and the Missing Bridge: A Map of the Design Methods for Post-Installed Bonded Steel in Concrete—Why a Reinforcing Bar May Ignore the Concrete Cone, Why a Threaded Rod May Not, and a Rule for When the Cone Is Relevant

De Lathouwer, Yves

Open source

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23463101
Published
2026
Container
Not recorded
Publisher
Zenodo
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.5281/zenodo.23463101,
  title = {Anchor Theory, Rebar Theory and the Missing Bridge: A Map of the Design Methods for Post-Installed Bonded Steel in Concrete—Why a Reinforcing Bar May Ignore the Concrete Cone, Why a Threaded Rod May Not, and a Rule for When the Cone Is Relevant},
  author = {De Lathouwer, Yves},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23463101},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23463101}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Anchor Theory, Rebar Theory and the Missing Bridge: A Map of the Design Methods for Post-Installed Bonded Steel in Concrete—Why a Reinforcing Bar May Ignore the Concrete Cone, Why a Threaded Rod May Not, and a Rule for When the Cone Is Relevant
AU  - De Lathouwer, Yves
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23463101
UR  - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23463101
ER  - 

APA

Yves, D. L. (2026). Anchor Theory, Rebar Theory and the Missing Bridge: A Map of the Design Methods for Post-Installed Bonded Steel in Concrete—Why a Reinforcing Bar May Ignore the Concrete Cone, Why a Threaded Rod May Not, and a Rule for When the Cone Is Relevant. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23463101

Source records