A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of centanafadine versus lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate and atomoxetine in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: long-term safety and efficacy.
- DOI
- 10.57264/cer-2024-0089
- Published
- 2024 Sep
- Container
- Journal of comparative effectiveness research
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.57264/cer-2024-0089,
title = {A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of centanafadine versus lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate and atomoxetine in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: long-term safety and efficacy.},
author = {Schein J and Cloutier M and Gauthier-Loiselle M and Catillon M and Xu C and Qu A and Lee F and Childress A},
year = {2024},
journal = {Journal of comparative effectiveness research},
doi = {10.57264/cer-2024-0089},
url = {https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0089}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of centanafadine versus lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate and atomoxetine in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: long-term safety and efficacy. AU - Schein J AU - Cloutier M AU - Gauthier-Loiselle M AU - Catillon M AU - Xu C AU - Qu A AU - Lee F AU - Childress A PY - 2024 JO - Journal of comparative effectiveness research DO - 10.57264/cer-2024-0089 UR - https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0089 ER -
APA
J, S., M, C., M, G., M, C., C, X., A, Q., F, L., & A, C. (2024). A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of centanafadine versus lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate and atomoxetine in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: long-term safety and efficacy.. Journal of comparative effectiveness research. https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0089
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T22:43:02.826Z