Methodological pitfalls in indirect treatment comparisons: insights from a recent systematic review and analysis for C3 glomerulopathy.
- DOI
- 10.57264/cer-2026-0054
- Published
- 2026 Sep
- Container
- Journal of comparative effectiveness research
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.57264/cer-2026-0054,
title = {Methodological pitfalls in indirect treatment comparisons: insights from a recent systematic review and analysis for C3 glomerulopathy.},
author = {Hutton B and Fotheringham J and Ervin A and Sidhu R and Lourenco C and Samjoo IA and Cameron C and Dunne B},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of comparative effectiveness research},
doi = {10.57264/cer-2026-0054},
url = {https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0054}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Methodological pitfalls in indirect treatment comparisons: insights from a recent systematic review and analysis for C3 glomerulopathy. AU - Hutton B AU - Fotheringham J AU - Ervin A AU - Sidhu R AU - Lourenco C AU - Samjoo IA AU - Cameron C AU - Dunne B PY - 2026 JO - Journal of comparative effectiveness research DO - 10.57264/cer-2026-0054 UR - https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0054 ER -
APA
B, H., J, F., A, E., R, S., C, L., IA, S., C, C., & B, D. (2026). Methodological pitfalls in indirect treatment comparisons: insights from a recent systematic review and analysis for C3 glomerulopathy.. Journal of comparative effectiveness research. https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0054
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T09:31:07.758Z