Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'.
- DOI
- 10.5935/1518-0557.20250158
- Published
- 2025 Sep 22
- Container
- JBRA assisted reproduction
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.5935/1518-0557.20250158,
title = {Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'.},
author = {Pretto L and Nabinger E and Montenegro IS and Sanseverino MTV and Artigalás O and Vianna FSL and Passos EP and Fraga LR},
year = {2025},
journal = {JBRA assisted reproduction},
doi = {10.5935/1518-0557.20250158},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250158}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'. AU - Pretto L AU - Nabinger E AU - Montenegro IS AU - Sanseverino MTV AU - Artigalás O AU - Vianna FSL AU - Passos EP AU - Fraga LR PY - 2025 JO - JBRA assisted reproduction DO - 10.5935/1518-0557.20250158 UR - https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250158 ER -
APA
L, P., E, N., IS, M., MTV, S., O, A., FSL, V., EP, P., & LR, F. (2025). Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'.. JBRA assisted reproduction. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250158
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T22:23:06.734Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T22:23:06.753Z