Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'.

Pretto L, Nabinger E, Montenegro IS, Sanseverino MTV, Artigalás O, Vianna FSL, Passos EP, Fraga LR

Open source

DOI
10.5935/1518-0557.20250158
Published
2025 Sep 22
Container
JBRA assisted reproduction
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.5935/1518-0557.20250158,
  title = {Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'.},
  author = {Pretto L and Nabinger E and Montenegro IS and Sanseverino MTV and Artigalás O and Vianna FSL and Passos EP and Fraga LR},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {JBRA assisted reproduction},
  doi = {10.5935/1518-0557.20250158},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250158}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'.
AU  - Pretto L
AU  - Nabinger E
AU  - Montenegro IS
AU  - Sanseverino MTV
AU  - Artigalás O
AU  - Vianna FSL
AU  - Passos EP
AU  - Fraga LR
PY  - 2025
JO  - JBRA assisted reproduction
DO  - 10.5935/1518-0557.20250158
UR  - https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250158
ER  - 

APA

L, P., E, N., IS, M., MTV, S., O, A., FSL, V., EP, P., & LR, F. (2025). Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'.. JBRA assisted reproduction. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250158

Source records