Natural vs. artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer: impact on clinical and obstetric outcomes.

Souza MDCB, Antunes RA, Souza MM, Mancebo ACA, Renovato TD, Raupp VA, Souza ALBM, Sequeira FF, Melo BML, Rabaço KA

Open source

DOI
10.5935/1518-0557.20260045
Published
2026 Jul 1
Container
JBRA assisted reproduction
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.5935/1518-0557.20260045,
  title = {Natural vs. artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer: impact on clinical and obstetric outcomes.},
  author = {Souza MDCB and Antunes RA and Souza MM and Mancebo ACA and Renovato TD and Raupp VA and Souza ALBM and Sequeira FF and Melo BML and Rabaço KA},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {JBRA assisted reproduction},
  doi = {10.5935/1518-0557.20260045},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20260045}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Natural vs. artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer: impact on clinical and obstetric outcomes.
AU  - Souza MDCB
AU  - Antunes RA
AU  - Souza MM
AU  - Mancebo ACA
AU  - Renovato TD
AU  - Raupp VA
AU  - Souza ALBM
AU  - Sequeira FF
AU  - Melo BML
AU  - Rabaço KA
PY  - 2026
JO  - JBRA assisted reproduction
DO  - 10.5935/1518-0557.20260045
UR  - https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20260045
ER  - 

APA

MDCB, S., RA, A., MM, S., ACA, M., TD, R., VA, R., ALBM, S., FF, S., BML, M., & KA, R. (2026). Natural vs. artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer: impact on clinical and obstetric outcomes.. JBRA assisted reproduction. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20260045

Source records