Intralesional triamcinolone versus 5-fluorouracil for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A randomized comparative clinical study.

Sharma A, T T, Singirikonda A, K P, B SP, Achanta A, Malik SN

DOI: 10.6026/973206300220461
Published: 2026
Container: Bioinformation
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.6026/973206300220461,
  title = {Intralesional triamcinolone versus 5-fluorouracil for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A randomized comparative clinical study.},
  author = {Sharma A and T T and Singirikonda A and K P and B SP and Achanta A and Malik SN},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Bioinformation},
  doi = {10.6026/973206300220461},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300220461}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Intralesional triamcinolone versus 5-fluorouracil for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A randomized comparative clinical study.
AU  - Sharma A
AU  - T T
AU  - Singirikonda A
AU  - K P
AU  - B SP
AU  - Achanta A
AU  - Malik SN
PY  - 2026
JO  - Bioinformation
DO  - 10.6026/973206300220461
UR  - https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300220461
ER  -

APA

A, S., T, T., A, S., P, K., SP, B., A, A., & SN, M. (2026). Intralesional triamcinolone versus 5-fluorouracil for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A randomized comparative clinical study.. Bioinformation. https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300220461

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:53:33.353Z