Traditional versus compressive implant osseointegration after immediate placement: A randomized histomorphometric study

Rajkran Chitumalla, Lalit Narayan Singh, Roshan Samuel, Rashmi R, Afreen Kouser, Meghna Pujara, Tanvi Hirani

Open source

DOI
10.6026/973206300220908
Published
2026-02-28
Container
Bioinformation
Publisher
Biomedical Informatics
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.6026/973206300220908,
  title = {Traditional versus compressive implant osseointegration after immediate placement: A randomized histomorphometric study},
  author = {Rajkran Chitumalla and Lalit Narayan Singh and Roshan Samuel and Rashmi R and Afreen Kouser and Meghna Pujara and Tanvi Hirani},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Bioinformation},
  doi = {10.6026/973206300220908},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300220908}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Traditional versus compressive implant osseointegration after immediate placement: A randomized histomorphometric study
AU  - Rajkran Chitumalla
AU  - Lalit Narayan Singh
AU  - Roshan Samuel
AU  - Rashmi R
AU  - Afreen Kouser
AU  - Meghna Pujara
AU  - Tanvi Hirani
PY  - 2026
JO  - Bioinformation
DO  - 10.6026/973206300220908
UR  - https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300220908
ER  - 

APA

Chitumalla, R., Singh, L. N., Samuel, R., R, R., Kouser, A., Pujara, M., & Hirani, T. (2026). Traditional versus compressive implant osseointegration after immediate placement: A randomized histomorphometric study. Bioinformation. https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300220908

Source records