Comparison of Vicryl Rapide Versus Chromic Catgut for Episiotomy Repair
- DOI
- 10.60692/4pqjc-9fs03
- Published
- 2024
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- OpenAlex
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.60692/4pqjc-9fs03,
title = {Comparison of Vicryl Rapide Versus Chromic Catgut for Episiotomy Repair},
author = {Sadaf Zahra Syed and Muhammad Afif Akbar and Naheed Akhtar and Nomia Ashraf and Afroze Ashraf and Sobia Manzoor},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.60692/4pqjc-9fs03},
url = {https://doi.org/10.60692/4pqjc-9fs03}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of Vicryl Rapide Versus Chromic Catgut for Episiotomy Repair AU - Sadaf Zahra Syed AU - Muhammad Afif Akbar AU - Naheed Akhtar AU - Nomia Ashraf AU - Afroze Ashraf AU - Sobia Manzoor PY - 2024 DO - 10.60692/4pqjc-9fs03 UR - https://doi.org/10.60692/4pqjc-9fs03 ER -
APA
Syed, S. Z., Akbar, M. A., Akhtar, N., Ashraf, N., Ashraf, A., & Manzoor, S. (2024). Comparison of Vicryl Rapide Versus Chromic Catgut for Episiotomy Repair. https://doi.org/10.60692/4pqjc-9fs03