Study Protocol: ChatGPT-generated versus expert-written answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes - an e-survey among all employees of a Danish diabetes center
- DOI
- 10.6084/m9.figshare.21940082.v3
- Published
- 2023
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- figshare
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 47/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.6084/m9.figshare.21940082.v3,
title = {Study Protocol: ChatGPT-generated versus expert-written answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes - an e-survey among all employees of a Danish diabetes center},
author = {Hulman, Adam and Dollerup, Ole Lindgård and Mortensen, Jesper Friis and Norman, Kasper and Støvring, Henrik and Hansen, Troels Krarup},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.6084/m9.figshare.21940082.v3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21940082.v3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Study Protocol: ChatGPT-generated versus expert-written answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes - an e-survey among all employees of a Danish diabetes center AU - Hulman, Adam AU - Dollerup, Ole Lindgård AU - Mortensen, Jesper Friis AU - Norman, Kasper AU - Støvring, Henrik AU - Hansen, Troels Krarup PY - 2023 DO - 10.6084/m9.figshare.21940082.v3 UR - https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21940082.v3 ER -
APA
Adam, H., Lindgård, D. O., Friis, M. J., Kasper, N., Henrik, S., & Krarup, H. T. (2023). Study Protocol: ChatGPT-generated versus expert-written answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes - an e-survey among all employees of a Danish diabetes center. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21940082.v3
Source records
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:09:00.489Z