Direct Molding of Luer Connections in PDMS MicrofluidicDevices: Comparison with Conventional Interface Methods The document contains pressure test data, test results using thicker chips, which were added in the “Supplementary” section, and tests conducted using biofilm as a biological model.

Gustavo Rosero

Open source

DOI
10.6084/m9.figshare.33755119.v1
Published
2026
Container
Not recorded
Publisher
figshare
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 47/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.6084/m9.figshare.33755119.v1,
  title = {Direct Molding of Luer Connections in PDMS MicrofluidicDevices: Comparison with Conventional Interface Methods The document contains pressure test data, test results using thicker chips, which were added in the “Supplementary” section, and tests conducted using biofilm as a biological model.},
  author = {Gustavo Rosero},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.6084/m9.figshare.33755119.v1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33755119.v1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Direct Molding of Luer Connections in PDMS MicrofluidicDevices: Comparison with Conventional Interface Methods The document contains pressure test data, test results using thicker chips, which were added in the “Supplementary” section, and tests conducted using biofilm as a biological model.
AU  - Gustavo Rosero
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.6084/m9.figshare.33755119.v1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33755119.v1
ER  - 

APA

Rosero, G. (2026). Direct Molding of Luer Connections in PDMS MicrofluidicDevices: Comparison with Conventional Interface Methods The document contains pressure test data, test results using thicker chips, which were added in the “Supplementary” section, and tests conducted using biofilm as a biological model.. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33755119.v1

Source records