NOTES sacrocolpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical pelvic organ prolapse: a pilot, hypothesis-generating, single-centre retrospective comparative cohort study
- DOI
- 10.6084/m9.figshare.33972608.v1
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 47/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.6084/m9.figshare.33972608.v1,
title = {NOTES sacrocolpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical pelvic organ prolapse: a pilot, hypothesis-generating, single-centre retrospective comparative cohort study},
author = {Varol Gülseren and Kemal Güngördük and Berican Şahin Uyar and Emre Biton and Serkan Üstüntaş and Kübra İnan},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.6084/m9.figshare.33972608.v1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33972608.v1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - NOTES sacrocolpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical pelvic organ prolapse: a pilot, hypothesis-generating, single-centre retrospective comparative cohort study AU - Varol Gülseren AU - Kemal Güngördük AU - Berican Şahin Uyar AU - Emre Biton AU - Serkan Üstüntaş AU - Kübra İnan PY - 2026 DO - 10.6084/m9.figshare.33972608.v1 UR - https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33972608.v1 ER -
APA
Gülseren, V., Güngördük, K., Uyar, B. Ş., Biton, E., Üstüntaş, S., & İnan, K. (2026). NOTES sacrocolpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical pelvic organ prolapse: a pilot, hypothesis-generating, single-centre retrospective comparative cohort study. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33972608.v1
Source records
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:03:15.633Z