The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification of chronic hypertension in pregnancy has better clinical applicability and risk assessment than the traditional severe and mild hypertension approach – lessons from a population-based study

Alex Rabinovich, Sujood Dar Diab, Adi Shiloh, Etty Speigel, Offer Erez

Open source

DOI
10.6084/m9.figshare.34898759.v1
Published
2026
Container
Not recorded
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 47/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.6084/m9.figshare.34898759.v1,
  title = {The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification of chronic hypertension in pregnancy has better clinical applicability and risk assessment than the traditional severe and mild hypertension approach – lessons from a population-based study},
  author = {Alex Rabinovich and Sujood Dar Diab and Adi Shiloh and Etty Speigel and Offer Erez},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.6084/m9.figshare.34898759.v1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34898759.v1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification of chronic hypertension in pregnancy has better clinical applicability and risk assessment than the traditional severe and mild hypertension approach – lessons from a population-based study
AU  - Alex Rabinovich
AU  - Sujood Dar Diab
AU  - Adi Shiloh
AU  - Etty Speigel
AU  - Offer Erez
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.6084/m9.figshare.34898759.v1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34898759.v1
ER  - 

APA

Rabinovich, A., Diab, S. D., Shiloh, A., Speigel, E., & Erez, O. (2026). The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification of chronic hypertension in pregnancy has better clinical applicability and risk assessment than the traditional severe and mild hypertension approach – lessons from a population-based study. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34898759.v1

Source records