Summary statistics and approximate bayesian computation are comparable to convolutional neural networks for inferring times to fixation.

Roberts MD, Josephs EB

Open source

DOI
10.64898/2026.02.17.706432
Published
2026 Feb 18
Container
bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.64898/2026.02.17.706432,
  title = {Summary statistics and approximate bayesian computation are comparable to convolutional neural networks for inferring times to fixation.},
  author = {Roberts MD and Josephs EB},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology},
  doi = {10.64898/2026.02.17.706432},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.17.706432}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Summary statistics and approximate bayesian computation are comparable to convolutional neural networks for inferring times to fixation.
AU  - Roberts MD
AU  - Josephs EB
PY  - 2026
JO  - bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
DO  - 10.64898/2026.02.17.706432
UR  - https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.17.706432
ER  - 

APA

MD, R., & EB, J. (2026). Summary statistics and approximate bayesian computation are comparable to convolutional neural networks for inferring times to fixation.. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.17.706432

Source records