How effective are contrastive learning-based approaches for activity-cliff prediction?

Surendran A, Miranda-Quintana RA

Open source

DOI
10.64898/2026.09.08.750257
Published
2026 Sep 14
Container
bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.64898/2026.09.08.750257,
  title = {How effective are contrastive learning-based approaches for activity-cliff prediction?},
  author = {Surendran A and Miranda-Quintana RA},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology},
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.08.750257},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.08.750257}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - How effective are contrastive learning-based approaches for activity-cliff prediction?
AU  - Surendran A
AU  - Miranda-Quintana RA
PY  - 2026
JO  - bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.08.750257
UR  - https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.08.750257
ER  - 

APA

A, S., & RA, M. (2026). How effective are contrastive learning-based approaches for activity-cliff prediction?. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.08.750257

Source records