Beauty premium? Evidence from institutional investors’ voting for all-star analysts

Li, Congcong, Lin, An-Ping, Lu, Hai, Veenstra, Kevin, Michael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies

Open source

DOI: 10.71548/3186
Published: 2017
Container: Not recorded
Publisher: McMaster University
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.71548/3186,
  title = {Beauty premium? Evidence from institutional investors’ voting for all-star analysts},
  author = {Li, Congcong and Lin, An-Ping and Lu, Hai and Veenstra, Kevin and Michael Lee-Chin \& Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies},
  year = {2017},
  doi = {10.71548/3186},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.71548/3186}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Beauty premium? Evidence from institutional investors’ voting for all-star analysts
AU  - Li, Congcong
AU  - Lin, An-Ping
AU  - Lu, Hai
AU  - Veenstra, Kevin
AU  - Michael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies
PY  - 2017
DO  - 10.71548/3186
UR  - https://doi.org/10.71548/3186
ER  -

APA

Congcong, L., An-Ping, L., Hai, L., Kevin, V., & Studies, M. L. &. F. I. F. S. B. (2017). Beauty premium? Evidence from institutional investors’ voting for all-star analysts. https://doi.org/10.71548/3186

Source records

datacite · retrieved 2026-09-27T08:29:05.654Z