Evaluating COPD care assistance: a comparative study of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and ERNIE bot performance.

Dai Z, Zeng Z, Zhan Z, Chen Y

DOI: 10.7189/jogh.16.04297
Published: 2026 Oct 19
Container: Journal of global health
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.7189/jogh.16.04297,
  title = {Evaluating COPD care assistance: a comparative study of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and ERNIE bot performance.},
  author = {Dai Z and Zeng Z and Zhan Z and Chen Y},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of global health},
  doi = {10.7189/jogh.16.04297},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.16.04297}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating COPD care assistance: a comparative study of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and ERNIE bot performance.
AU  - Dai Z
AU  - Zeng Z
AU  - Zhan Z
AU  - Chen Y
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of global health
DO  - 10.7189/jogh.16.04297
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.16.04297
ER  -

APA

Z, D., Z, Z., Z, Z., & Y, C. (2026). Evaluating COPD care assistance: a comparative study of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and ERNIE bot performance.. Journal of global health. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.16.04297

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T09:15:43.059Z