Action Maze and Role Playing in comparison: A Randomized Field Trial on simulation-based teaching methodologies in critical care.
- DOI
- 10.7416/ai.2025.2698
- Published
- 2025-04-15
- Container
- Ann Ig
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.7416/ai.2025.2698,
title = {Action Maze and Role Playing in comparison: A Randomized Field Trial on simulation-based teaching methodologies in critical care.},
author = {Colacci T and Bonavoglia F and Dibattista F and Gargaro V and Taborri S and La Torre G.},
year = {2025},
journal = {Ann Ig},
doi = {10.7416/ai.2025.2698},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2025.2698}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Action Maze and Role Playing in comparison: A Randomized Field Trial on simulation-based teaching methodologies in critical care. AU - Colacci T AU - Bonavoglia F AU - Dibattista F AU - Gargaro V AU - Taborri S AU - La Torre G. PY - 2025 JO - Ann Ig DO - 10.7416/ai.2025.2698 UR - https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2025.2698 ER -
APA
T, C., F, B., F, D., V, G., S, T., & G., L. T. (2025). Action Maze and Role Playing in comparison: A Randomized Field Trial on simulation-based teaching methodologies in critical care.. Ann Ig. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2025.2698
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T18:19:05.281Z