Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
- DOI
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.1023
- Published
- 2022-08-08
- Container
- PeerJ Computer Science
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.7717/peerj-cs.1023,
title = {Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories},
author = {Daniel Garijo and Hervé Ménager and Lorraine Hwang and Ana Trisovic and Michael Hucka and Thomas Morrell and Alice Allen and Unknown and Unknown},
year = {2022},
journal = {PeerJ Computer Science},
doi = {10.7717/peerj-cs.1023},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories AU - Daniel Garijo AU - Hervé Ménager AU - Lorraine Hwang AU - Ana Trisovic AU - Michael Hucka AU - Thomas Morrell AU - Alice Allen AU - Unknown AU - Unknown PY - 2022 JO - PeerJ Computer Science DO - 10.7717/peerj-cs.1023 UR - https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023 ER -
APA
Garijo, D., Ménager, H., Hwang, L., Trisovic, A., Hucka, M., Morrell, T., Allen, A., Unknown, & Unknown (2022). Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories. PeerJ Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T01:43:28.384Z