A systematic metadata harvesting workflow for analysing scientific networks.
- DOI
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.421
- Published
- 2021
- Container
- PeerJ. Computer science
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.7717/peerj-cs.421,
title = {A systematic metadata harvesting workflow for analysing scientific networks.},
author = {Butt BH and Rafi M and Sabih M},
year = {2021},
journal = {PeerJ. Computer science},
doi = {10.7717/peerj-cs.421},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.421}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A systematic metadata harvesting workflow for analysing scientific networks. AU - Butt BH AU - Rafi M AU - Sabih M PY - 2021 JO - PeerJ. Computer science DO - 10.7717/peerj-cs.421 UR - https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.421 ER -
APA
BH, B., M, R., & M, S. (2021). A systematic metadata harvesting workflow for analysing scientific networks.. PeerJ. Computer science. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.421
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T20:39:52.900Z