The reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for rating the single leg squat test.

Zhang Y, Liu Y, Huang X, Carcia CR, Martin RL, Pan Z

Open source

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21600
Published: 2026
Container: PeerJ
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.7717/peerj.21600,
  title = {The reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for rating the single leg squat test.},
  author = {Zhang Y and Liu Y and Huang X and Carcia CR and Martin RL and Pan Z},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {PeerJ},
  doi = {10.7717/peerj.21600},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21600}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for rating the single leg squat test.
AU  - Zhang Y
AU  - Liu Y
AU  - Huang X
AU  - Carcia CR
AU  - Martin RL
AU  - Pan Z
PY  - 2026
JO  - PeerJ
DO  - 10.7717/peerj.21600
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21600
ER  -

APA

Y, Z., Y, L., X, H., CR, C., RL, M., & Z, P. (2026). The reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for rating the single leg squat test.. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21600

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:17:39.969Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:17:40.006Z
doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:17:39.975Z