Thinking inside and outside the box: Comparing the efficacy of camera trap designs for surveying small mammals

Phoebe Williams, Xenia Green, Amelia Grass, Anthony Caravaggi

Open source

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.21654
Published: 2026-09-23
Container: PeerJ
Publisher: PeerJ
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.7717/peerj.21654,
  title = {Thinking inside and outside the box: Comparing the efficacy of camera trap designs for surveying small mammals},
  author = {Phoebe Williams and Xenia Green and Amelia Grass and Anthony Caravaggi},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {PeerJ},
  doi = {10.7717/peerj.21654},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21654}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Thinking inside and outside the box: Comparing the efficacy of camera trap designs for surveying small mammals
AU  - Phoebe Williams
AU  - Xenia Green
AU  - Amelia Grass
AU  - Anthony Caravaggi
PY  - 2026
JO  - PeerJ
DO  - 10.7717/peerj.21654
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21654
ER  -

APA

Williams, P., Green, X., Grass, A., & Caravaggi, A. (2026). Thinking inside and outside the box: Comparing the efficacy of camera trap designs for surveying small mammals. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21654

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T12:38:15.493Z