Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers.

Nüst D, Granell C, Hofer B, Konkol M, Ostermann FO, Sileryte R, Cerutti V

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5072
Published: 2018
Container: PeerJ
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.7717/peerj.5072,
  title = {Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers.},
  author = {Nüst D and Granell C and Hofer B and Konkol M and Ostermann FO and Sileryte R and Cerutti V},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {PeerJ},
  doi = {10.7717/peerj.5072},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5072}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers.
AU  - Nüst D
AU  - Granell C
AU  - Hofer B
AU  - Konkol M
AU  - Ostermann FO
AU  - Sileryte R
AU  - Cerutti V
PY  - 2018
JO  - PeerJ
DO  - 10.7717/peerj.5072
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5072
ER  -

APA

D, N., C, G., B, H., M, K., FO, O., R, S., & V, C. (2018). Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers.. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5072

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T00:50:21.002Z