Comparison of Different Methods of Labor Induction and Their Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Okobi OE, Oladimeji A, Durojaiye IA, Adewara O, Mochu AW, Shofu O, Adedoyin AM, Arifayan SO

Open source

DOI
10.7759/cureus.109016
Published
2026 May
Container
Cureus
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.7759/cureus.109016,
  title = {Comparison of Different Methods of Labor Induction and Their Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.},
  author = {Okobi OE and Oladimeji A and Durojaiye IA and Adewara O and Mochu AW and Shofu O and Adedoyin AM and Arifayan SO},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Cureus},
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.109016},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109016}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Different Methods of Labor Induction and Their Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
AU  - Okobi OE
AU  - Oladimeji A
AU  - Durojaiye IA
AU  - Adewara O
AU  - Mochu AW
AU  - Shofu O
AU  - Adedoyin AM
AU  - Arifayan SO
PY  - 2026
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.109016
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109016
ER  - 

APA

OE, O., A, O., IA, D., O, A., AW, M., O, S., AM, A., & SO, A. (2026). Comparison of Different Methods of Labor Induction and Their Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109016

Source records