Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) Gel Versus Solution With Sonic Activation: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

Gurkirat Singh, Rajinder Bansal, Manu Bansal, Jasvinder Kaur, Sangam Mittal, Nishant Sharma

Open source

DOI
10.7759/cureus.109951
Published
2026-05-30
Container
Cureus
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.7759/cureus.109951,
  title = {Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) Gel Versus Solution With Sonic Activation: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study},
  author = {Gurkirat Singh and Rajinder Bansal and Manu Bansal and Jasvinder Kaur and Sangam Mittal and Nishant Sharma},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Cureus},
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.109951},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109951}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) Gel Versus Solution With Sonic Activation: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
AU  - Gurkirat Singh
AU  - Rajinder Bansal
AU  - Manu Bansal
AU  - Jasvinder Kaur
AU  - Sangam Mittal
AU  - Nishant Sharma
PY  - 2026
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.109951
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109951
ER  - 

APA

Singh, G., Bansal, R., Bansal, M., Kaur, J., Mittal, S., & Sharma, N. (2026). Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) Gel Versus Solution With Sonic Activation: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109951

Source records