Clinical Effectiveness of Tap Water Versus Povidone-Iodine Bladder Irrigation for Recurrent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: A Comparative Review of Contemporary Clinical Evidence.

Talwar Y, Agrawal H, Singh KD, Pilania C

Open source

DOI
10.7759/cureus.115123
Published
2026 Aug
Container
Cureus
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.7759/cureus.115123,
  title = {Clinical Effectiveness of Tap Water Versus Povidone-Iodine Bladder Irrigation for Recurrent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: A Comparative Review of Contemporary Clinical Evidence.},
  author = {Talwar Y and Agrawal H and Singh KD and Pilania C},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Cureus},
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.115123},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.115123}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical Effectiveness of Tap Water Versus Povidone-Iodine Bladder Irrigation for Recurrent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: A Comparative Review of Contemporary Clinical Evidence.
AU  - Talwar Y
AU  - Agrawal H
AU  - Singh KD
AU  - Pilania C
PY  - 2026
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.115123
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.115123
ER  - 

APA

Y, T., H, A., KD, S., & C, P. (2026). Clinical Effectiveness of Tap Water Versus Povidone-Iodine Bladder Irrigation for Recurrent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: A Comparative Review of Contemporary Clinical Evidence.. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.115123

Source records