Comparative Evaluation of Three Endodontic File Systems for Pericervical Dentin Preservation and Canal Transportation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vivo Study.
- DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.116400
- Published
- 2026 Sep
- Container
- Cureus
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.7759/cureus.116400,
title = {Comparative Evaluation of Three Endodontic File Systems for Pericervical Dentin Preservation and Canal Transportation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vivo Study.},
author = {Suresh N and Manan R and Vats S and Rathee K and Chauhan B and Gutti AB},
year = {2026},
journal = {Cureus},
doi = {10.7759/cureus.116400},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.116400}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative Evaluation of Three Endodontic File Systems for Pericervical Dentin Preservation and Canal Transportation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vivo Study. AU - Suresh N AU - Manan R AU - Vats S AU - Rathee K AU - Chauhan B AU - Gutti AB PY - 2026 JO - Cureus DO - 10.7759/cureus.116400 UR - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.116400 ER -
APA
N, S., R, M., S, V., K, R., B, C., & AB, G. (2026). Comparative Evaluation of Three Endodontic File Systems for Pericervical Dentin Preservation and Canal Transportation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vivo Study.. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.116400
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T07:58:44.514Z