Ten Steps to Conduct a Systematic Review.
- DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.51422
- Published
- 2023 Dec
- Container
- Cureus
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.7759/cureus.51422,
title = {Ten Steps to Conduct a Systematic Review.},
author = {Calderon Martinez E and Flores Valdés JR and Castillo JL and Castillo JV and Blanco Montecino RM and Morin Jimenez JE and Arriaga Escamilla D and Diarte E},
year = {2023},
journal = {Cureus},
doi = {10.7759/cureus.51422},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51422}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Ten Steps to Conduct a Systematic Review. AU - Calderon Martinez E AU - Flores Valdés JR AU - Castillo JL AU - Castillo JV AU - Blanco Montecino RM AU - Morin Jimenez JE AU - Arriaga Escamilla D AU - Diarte E PY - 2023 JO - Cureus DO - 10.7759/cureus.51422 UR - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51422 ER -
APA
E, C. M., JR, F. V., JL, C., JV, C., RM, B. M., JE, M. J., D, A. E., & E, D. (2023). Ten Steps to Conduct a Systematic Review.. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51422
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T19:05:38.132Z