Categorizing Extremely Positive Five-Star Online Reviews for Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons: A Retrospective Study
- DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.71932
- Published
- 2024-10-20
- Container
- Cureus
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.7759/cureus.71932,
title = {Categorizing Extremely Positive Five-Star Online Reviews for Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons: A Retrospective Study},
author = {Albert Anastasio and Anthony N Baumann and Lulla V Kiwinda and Lindsey V Ruderman and Kyle Hitchman and Andrew E Hanselman and Samuel B Adams},
year = {2024},
journal = {Cureus},
doi = {10.7759/cureus.71932},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71932}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Categorizing Extremely Positive Five-Star Online Reviews for Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons: A Retrospective Study AU - Albert Anastasio AU - Anthony N Baumann AU - Lulla V Kiwinda AU - Lindsey V Ruderman AU - Kyle Hitchman AU - Andrew E Hanselman AU - Samuel B Adams PY - 2024 JO - Cureus DO - 10.7759/cureus.71932 UR - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71932 ER -
APA
Anastasio, A., Baumann, A. N., Kiwinda, L. V., Ruderman, L. V., Hitchman, K., Hanselman, A. E., & Adams, S. B. (2024). Categorizing Extremely Positive Five-Star Online Reviews for Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons: A Retrospective Study. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71932
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T04:45:47.111Z