Comparing the Sensitivity and Specificity of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis in a Rural Setting.
- DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.80316
- Published
- 2025-03-09
- Container
- Cureus
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.7759/cureus.80316,
title = {Comparing the Sensitivity and Specificity of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis in a Rural Setting.},
author = {Gerbasi L and Gunsberger T and Santarelli A and Ashurst J.},
year = {2025},
journal = {Cureus},
doi = {10.7759/cureus.80316},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80316}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparing the Sensitivity and Specificity of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis in a Rural Setting. AU - Gerbasi L AU - Gunsberger T AU - Santarelli A AU - Ashurst J. PY - 2025 JO - Cureus DO - 10.7759/cureus.80316 UR - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80316 ER -
APA
L, G., T, G., A, S., & J., A. (2025). Comparing the Sensitivity and Specificity of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis in a Rural Setting.. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80316
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T00:32:41.898Z