Retraction: A Systematic Review of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Versus Daily Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Is Shorter Really Better?
- DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.r246
- Published
- 2026 Sep
- Container
- Cureus
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.7759/cureus.r246,
title = {Retraction: A Systematic Review of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Versus Daily Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Is Shorter Really Better?},
author = {Saxena A and Khan B and Rupanshu R and Mann RS and Chopra I and Kilic A and Hamid PF},
year = {2026},
journal = {Cureus},
doi = {10.7759/cureus.r246},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.r246}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Retraction: A Systematic Review of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Versus Daily Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Is Shorter Really Better? AU - Saxena A AU - Khan B AU - Rupanshu R AU - Mann RS AU - Chopra I AU - Kilic A AU - Hamid PF PY - 2026 JO - Cureus DO - 10.7759/cureus.r246 UR - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.r246 ER -
APA
A, S., B, K., R, R., RS, M., I, C., A, K., & PF, H. (2026). Retraction: A Systematic Review of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Versus Daily Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Is Shorter Really Better?. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.r246
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T09:21:25.344Z