Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate

Fudalej, SA, Desmedt, D, Bronkhorst, E, Fudalej, Piotr

DOI: 10.7892/boris.112307
Published: 2017
Container: Not recorded
Publisher: University of Bern
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.7892/boris.112307,
  title = {Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate},
  author = {Fudalej, SA and Desmedt, D and Bronkhorst, E and Fudalej, Piotr},
  year = {2017},
  doi = {10.7892/boris.112307},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.112307}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate
AU  - Fudalej, SA
AU  - Desmedt, D
AU  - Bronkhorst, E
AU  - Fudalej, Piotr
PY  - 2017
DO  - 10.7892/boris.112307
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.112307
ER  -

APA

SA, F., D, D., E, B., & Piotr, F. (2017). Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate. https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.112307

Source records

datacite · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:37:58.801Z