Women's experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study.

Machold CA, O'Rinn SE, McKellin WH, Ballantyne G, Barrett JFR

DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200079
Published: 2021 Jul-Sep
Container: CMAJ open
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.9778/cmajo.20200079,
  title = {Women's experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study.},
  author = {Machold CA and O'Rinn SE and McKellin WH and Ballantyne G and Barrett JFR},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {CMAJ open},
  doi = {10.9778/cmajo.20200079},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200079}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Women's experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study.
AU  - Machold CA
AU  - O'Rinn SE
AU  - McKellin WH
AU  - Ballantyne G
AU  - Barrett JFR
PY  - 2021
JO  - CMAJ open
DO  - 10.9778/cmajo.20200079
UR  - https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200079
ER  -

APA

CA, M., SE, O., WH, M., G, B., & JFR, B. (2021). Women's experiences of skin-to-skin cesarean birth compared to standard cesarean birth: a qualitative study.. CMAJ open. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200079

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:31:57.273Z