Comparison of Motivational Interviewing with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A Conceptual and Clinical Review

actpapercliniciantier 3link oklink-only

Open source

Overview

AI-generated summary, not a substitute for reading the source.

This paper provides a systematic comparison of Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), examining their conceptual foundations and clinical applications. The authors analyze differences in philosophical bases, therapeutic relationships, language use, and the role of values in motivating behavior change. The resource is intended for clinicians and researchers interested in understanding the distinctions and potential complementarity between these two behavioral therapies.

ID
3f3b1a4794d5474f
Source org
OpenAlex
Author
Jonathan B. Bricker (University of Washington), Sean J. Tollison (University of Washington)
Published
2011-02-22
OA status
green
DOI
10.1017/s1352465810000901
PMID
Not recorded
PMCID
Not recorded
Citations
56

Tags

Verification

Automated checks only, not clinical endorsement or advice.

Cite this entry

BibTeX

@article{allodium:3f3b1a4794d5474f,
  title = {Comparison of Motivational Interviewing with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A Conceptual and Clinical Review},
  author = {Jonathan B. Bricker and Sean J. Tollison},
  year = {2011},
  journal = {OpenAlex},
  doi = {10.1017/s1352465810000901},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465810000901}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Motivational Interviewing with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A Conceptual and Clinical Review
AU  - Bricker, Jonathan B.
AU  - Tollison, Sean J.
PY  - 2011
PB  - OpenAlex
DO  - 10.1017/s1352465810000901
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465810000901
ER  -

APA

Bricker, J. B., & Tollison, S. J. (2011). Comparison of Motivational Interviewing with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A Conceptual and Clinical Review. OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465810000901

Related entries

More like this