Evaluating acceptance and commitment therapy: An analysis of a recent critique.

actpapercliniciantier 3link oklink-only

Open source

Overview

AI-generated summary, not a substitute for reading the source.

This paper analyzes a 2008 critique by Hofmann and Asmundson, which argued that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) lacks distinct theoretical value compared to traditional Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT). The author examines the evidential merit of these claims to clarify potential misunderstandings between proponents of the two approaches. The resource is intended for readers interested in the theoretical distinctions and debates surrounding ACT.

ID
9edcc1581825478c
Source org
OpenAlex
Author
Brandon A. Gaudiano (Brown University)
Published
2011-01-01
OA status
hybrid
DOI
10.1037/h0100927
PMID
Not recorded
PMCID
Not recorded
Citations
26

Tags

Verification

Automated checks only, not clinical endorsement or advice.

Cite this entry

BibTeX

@article{allodium:9edcc1581825478c,
  title = {Evaluating acceptance and commitment therapy: An analysis of a recent critique.},
  author = {Brandon A. Gaudiano},
  year = {2011},
  journal = {OpenAlex},
  doi = {10.1037/h0100927},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100927}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating acceptance and commitment therapy: An analysis of a recent critique.
AU  - Gaudiano, Brandon A.
PY  - 2011
PB  - OpenAlex
DO  - 10.1037/h0100927
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100927
ER  -

APA

Gaudiano, B. A. (2011). Evaluating acceptance and commitment therapy: An analysis of a recent critique.. OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100927

Related entries

More like this