Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Empirical Evidence

actpapercliniciantier 3link inconclusive

Open source

Overview

AI-generated summary, not a substitute for reading the source.

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) with traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) across sixteen studies involving 954 participants. The authors report that ACT showed significantly greater effects on primary outcomes, depression, quality of life, and its proposed processes of change compared to CBT. The resource is intended for researchers or clinicians interested in empirical comparisons between these therapeutic modalities.

ID
be8927f54aed4318
Source org
OpenAlex
Author
Not recorded
Published
Not recorded
OA status
Not recorded
DOI
Not recorded
PMID
Not recorded
PMCID
Not recorded
Citations
Not recorded

Tags

Verification

Automated checks only, not clinical endorsement or advice.

Cite this entry

BibTeX

@article{allodium:be8927f54aed4318,
  title = {Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Empirical Evidence},
  journal = {OpenAlex},
  url = {https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/679}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Empirical Evidence
PB  - OpenAlex
UR  - https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/679
ER  -

APA

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Empirical Evidence. (n.d.). OpenAlex. https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/679

Related entries

More like this