The empirical status of acceptance and commitment therapy: A review of meta-analyses
Overview
This paper reviews meta-analytic evidence regarding the efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) across various target conditions. The authors analyze data from 20 included meta-analyses involving over 12,000 participants to assess ACT's effectiveness against different control groups. The resource is intended for readers interested in a summary of empirical findings on ACT's performance relative to inactive controls and other active interventions.
- ID
df42d69f6d8841ef- Source org
- OpenAlex
- Author
- Andrew T. Gloster (University of Basel), Noemi Walder (University of Basel), Michael E. Levin (Utah State University), Michael P. Twohig (Utah State University), Maria Karekla (University of Cyprus)
- Published
- 2020-09-29
- OA status
- hybrid
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009
- PMID
- Not recorded
- PMCID
- Not recorded
- Citations
- 610
Tags
Verification
- identityok via crossref · score 1 · checked_at unknown
- legitimacykeep via unknown · score 1 · checked_at unknown
- linkok via http-check · 2026-07-21T15:52:31.592259+00:00
Cite this entry
BibTeX
@article{allodium:df42d69f6d8841ef,
title = {The empirical status of acceptance and commitment therapy: A review of meta-analyses},
author = {Andrew T. Gloster and Noemi Walder and Michael E. Levin and Michael P. Twohig and Maria Karekla},
year = {2020},
journal = {OpenAlex},
doi = {10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The empirical status of acceptance and commitment therapy: A review of meta-analyses AU - Gloster, Andrew T. AU - Walder, Noemi AU - Levin, Michael E. AU - Twohig, Michael P. AU - Karekla, Maria PY - 2020 PB - OpenAlex DO - 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009 ER -
APA
Gloster, A. T., Walder, N., Levin, M. E., Twohig, M. P., & Karekla, M. (2020). The empirical status of acceptance and commitment therapy: A review of meta-analyses. OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009
Related entries
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Empirical Evidence
- An Overview of Reviews on the Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on Depression and Anxiety
- Acceptance and commitment therapy – Do we know enough? Cumulative and sequential meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
- Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy for addictive behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Reducing Depression and Anxiety in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-guided online acceptance and commitment therapy as a transdiagnostic self-help intervention
- Process of change and efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for anxiety and depression symptoms in adolescents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Effects of group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy group for treatment-resistant participants: A randomized controlled trial
- Acceptance and commitment therapy: towards a unified model of behavior change