Youth Metacognitive Therapy (YoMeta): protocol for a single-blind randomised feasibility trial of a transdiagnostic intervention versus treatment as usual in 11–16-year-olds with common mental health problems
Overview
This paper outlines the protocol for a single-blind randomized feasibility trial evaluating group Metacognitive Therapy (YoMeta) for children and young people aged 11–16 with common mental health problems. The study compares an eight-session group intervention against usual care across UK CAMHS services, assessing feasibility through recruitment and retention metrics, and acceptability via attendance and qualitative interviews. It also measures psychological distress, well-being, and metacognitive beliefs to inform future large-scale effectiveness research.
- ID
012cd9e387a74630- Source org
- PubMed Central
- Author
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- OA status
- Not recorded
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40814-022-01162-5
- PMID
- Not recorded
- PMCID
- Not recorded
- Citations
- Not recorded
Tags
Verification
- identityok via crossref · score 1 · checked_at unknown
- legitimacykeep via unknown · score 1 · checked_at unknown
- linkok via http-check · 2026-07-28T03:58:44.050956+00:00
Cite this entry
BibTeX
@article{allodium:012cd9e387a74630,
title = {Youth Metacognitive Therapy (YoMeta): protocol for a single-blind randomised feasibility trial of a transdiagnostic intervention versus treatment as usual in 11–16-year-olds with common mental health problems},
journal = {PubMed Central},
doi = {10.1186/s40814-022-01162-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01162-5}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Youth Metacognitive Therapy (YoMeta): protocol for a single-blind randomised feasibility trial of a transdiagnostic intervention versus treatment as usual in 11–16-year-olds with common mental health problems PB - PubMed Central DO - 10.1186/s40814-022-01162-5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01162-5 ER -
APA
Youth Metacognitive Therapy (YoMeta): protocol for a single-blind randomised feasibility trial of a transdiagnostic intervention versus treatment as usual in 11–16-year-olds with common mental health problems. (n.d.). PubMed Central. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01162-5
Related entries
- Misclassifying and differentiating metacognitive therapy: conceptual and methodological issues in Stenzel et al.
- Children and young people’s experiences of receiving group metacognitive therapy: Thematic analysis of a transdiagnostic treatment for common mental health problems
- Group metacognitive therapy for children and adolescents with anxiety and depression: A preliminary trial and test of proposed mechanisms
- The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Generic Group Metacognitive Therapy for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder and Related Problems: a Preliminary Evaluation in Specialized Mental Health Care
- Metacognitive Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Youth: A Feasibility Study
- Metacognitive Therapy for Depression in Adults: A Waiting List Randomized Controlled Trial with Six Months Follow-Up
- Applying metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder to adolescents: results from an open trial with 3- and 6-months follow-up
- A Preliminary Evaluation of Transdiagnostic Group Metacognitive Therapy in a Mixed Psychological Disorder Sample
- The effect of metacognitive therapy on depressive symptoms from a transdiagnostic perspective: a systematic review, meta-regression and meta-analysis