A comparison of cognitive bias modification for interpretation and computerized cognitive behavior therapy: Effects on anxiety, depression, attentional control, and interpretive bias.
Overview
This study compares computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) and cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I) in adults with high social anxiety. Both interventions significantly reduced anxiety, depression, and negative interpretive bias compared to a control group, with no overall difference in therapeutic efficacy. However, CBM-I demonstrated greater effectiveness in modifying threat-related bias under conditions of high mental load.
- ID
c6d4e7538c364ed1- Source org
- OpenAlex
- Author
- Jennifer O. Bowler (University of East Anglia), Bundy Mackintosh, Barnaby D. Dunn, Andrew Mathews, Tim Dalgleish, Laura Hoppitt
- Published
- 2012-09-10
- OA status
- hybrid
- DOI
- 10.1037/a0029932
- PMID
- Not recorded
- PMCID
- Not recorded
- Citations
- 177
Tags
Verification
- identityok via crossref · score 1 · checked_at unknown
- legitimacykeep via unknown · score 0.95 · checked_at unknown
- linkok via http-check · 2026-07-21T15:52:31.592259+00:00
Cite this entry
BibTeX
@article{allodium:c6d4e7538c364ed1,
title = {A comparison of cognitive bias modification for interpretation and computerized cognitive behavior therapy: Effects on anxiety, depression, attentional control, and interpretive bias.},
author = {Jennifer O. Bowler and Bundy Mackintosh and Barnaby D. Dunn and Andrew Mathews and Tim Dalgleish and Laura Hoppitt},
year = {2012},
journal = {OpenAlex},
doi = {10.1037/a0029932},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029932}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A comparison of cognitive bias modification for interpretation and computerized cognitive behavior therapy: Effects on anxiety, depression, attentional control, and interpretive bias. AU - Bowler, Jennifer O. AU - Mackintosh, Bundy AU - Dunn, Barnaby D. AU - Mathews, Andrew AU - Dalgleish, Tim AU - Hoppitt, Laura PY - 2012 PB - OpenAlex DO - 10.1037/a0029932 UR - https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029932 ER -
APA
Bowler, J. O., Mackintosh, B., Dunn, B. D., Mathews, A., Dalgleish, T., & Hoppitt, L. (2012). A comparison of cognitive bias modification for interpretation and computerized cognitive behavior therapy: Effects on anxiety, depression, attentional control, and interpretive bias.. OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029932
Related entries
- Multi-session CBM-I for social anxiety: examining psychopathology, cognitive, neural, and psychophysiological effects in a randomized controlled trial
- Low-intensity mindfulness and cognitive–behavioral therapy for social anxiety: a pilot randomized controlled trial
- High‐intensity mindfulness and cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: Preliminary efficacy
- The effectiveness and neurobiological actions of memory bias modification: a randomized controlled trial
- How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta‐analytic update of the evidence
- Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs. Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
- Computer-assisted delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders in primary-care settings
- Cognitive behavioral therapy in anxiety disorders: current state of the evidence
- Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: an update on the empirical evidence
- Effectiveness of Guided Internet‐Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adult Anxiety and Depression in Routine Care: An Observational Study