Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Overview
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of computerized cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression in adolescents and young adults aged 12-25. The authors analyzed 24 randomized controlled trials, comparing cCBT outcomes against active and passive control groups while examining moderators such as age and guidance level. The resource is intended for researchers and clinicians interested in the evidence base for digital mental health interventions in this demographic.
- ID
096635cd3ec24b60- Source org
- OpenAlex
- Author
- Carolien Christ (GGZ inGeest), Maria J. E. Schouten (Arkin), Matthijs Blankers (Trimbos Institute), Anneke van Schaik (GGZ inGeest), Aartjan T.F. Beekman (GGZ inGeest), Marike A Wisman (Arkin), Yvonne Stikkelbroek (Utrecht University), Jack Dekker (Arkin)
- Published
- 2020-07-16
- OA status
- gold
- DOI
- 10.2196/17831
- PMID
- Not recorded
- PMCID
- Not recorded
- Citations
- 152
Tags
Verification
- identityok via crossref · score 1 · checked_at unknown
- legitimacykeep via unknown · score 0.95 · checked_at unknown
- linkok via http-check · 2026-07-21T15:52:31.592259+00:00
Cite this entry
BibTeX
@article{allodium:096635cd3ec24b60,
title = {Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis},
author = {Carolien Christ and Maria J. E. Schouten and Matthijs Blankers and Anneke van Schaik and Aartjan T.F. Beekman and Marike A Wisman and Yvonne Stikkelbroek and Jack Dekker},
year = {2020},
journal = {OpenAlex},
doi = {10.2196/17831},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2196/17831}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis AU - Christ, Carolien AU - Schouten, Maria J. E. AU - Blankers, Matthijs AU - Schaik, Anneke van AU - Beekman, Aartjan T.F. AU - Wisman, Marike A AU - Stikkelbroek, Yvonne AU - Dekker, Jack PY - 2020 PB - OpenAlex DO - 10.2196/17831 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/17831 ER -
APA
Christ, C., Schouten, M. J. E., Blankers, M., Schaik, A. V., Beekman, A. T., Wisman, M. A., Stikkelbroek, Y., & Dekker, J. (2020). Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.2196/17831
Related entries
- Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Youth: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Outcome Trials
- Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effectiveness of technology-assisted vs face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in children and young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Therapist‐supported Internet‐based cognitive behaviour therapy yields similar effects as face‐to‐face therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis
- The intervention effect of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy on anxiety, depression, and stress in college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
- Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
- Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Cognitive behavior therapy for internalizing disorders in children and adolescents in routine clinical care: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta‐analytic update of the evidence