Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research

mctpapercliniciantier 3link ok

Open source

Overview

AI-generated summary, not a substitute for reading the source.

This paper reviews and critiques the use of self-report measures in metacognitive research through systematic reviews and a meta-analysis of studies from 1982 to 2018. It examines how well self-reports evaluate metacognitive knowledge, regulation, and behavior, noting that while they provide a useful overview of certain factors, their relationship to actual metacognitive behavior is unclear. The resource is intended for researchers designing studies on metacognition.

ID
8b0bccadd4ca4a99
Source org
OpenAlex
Author
Not recorded
Published
Not recorded
OA status
Not recorded
DOI
10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y
PMID
Not recorded
PMCID
Not recorded
Citations
Not recorded

Tags

Verification

Automated checks only, not clinical endorsement or advice.

Cite this entry

BibTeX

@article{allodium:8b0bccadd4ca4a99,
  title = {Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research},
  journal = {OpenAlex},
  doi = {10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research
PB  - OpenAlex
DO  - 10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y
ER  -

APA

Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research. (n.d.). OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y

Related entries

More like this