Metacognitive Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy:A Network Approach

mctpapercliniciantier 3link oklink-only

Open source

Overview

AI-generated summary, not a substitute for reading the source.

This paper compares the symptom networks of Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) using data from a randomized controlled trial involving 74 patients with comorbid anxiety disorders. The study analyzes weekly measurements of symptoms and mechanisms to determine how each therapy affects the causal structure of mental problems. It identifies worry and attention as central nodes in both treatments, while noting that negative metacognitive beliefs were more central in MCT, consistent with the S-REF model.

ID
f2558f54fa4b4e47
Source org
OpenAlex
Author
Sverre Urnes Johnson (Modum Bad – Gordon Johnsens stiftelse), Asle Hoffart (University of Oslo)
Published
2018-11-30
OA status
gold
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02382
PMID
Not recorded
PMCID
Not recorded
Citations
27

Tags

Verification

Automated checks only, not clinical endorsement or advice.

Cite this entry

BibTeX

@article{allodium:f2558f54fa4b4e47,
  title = {Metacognitive Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy:A Network Approach},
  author = {Sverre Urnes Johnson and Asle Hoffart},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {OpenAlex},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02382},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02382}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Metacognitive Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy:A Network Approach
AU  - Johnson, Sverre Urnes
AU  - Hoffart, Asle
PY  - 2018
PB  - OpenAlex
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02382
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02382
ER  -

APA

Johnson, S. U., & Hoffart, A. (2018). Metacognitive Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy:A Network Approach. OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02382

Related entries

More like this