Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence

mipapercliniciantier 3link ok

Open source

Overview

AI-generated summary, not a substitute for reading the source.

This paper contrasts two methods for addressing client ambivalence: decisional balance (DB) and the evocation of change talk. It reviews empirical evidence to suggest that DB tends to decrease commitment to change, while evocation promotes it. The resource indicates that DB is suitable for maintaining neutrality, whereas evocation is appropriate when the goal is to facilitate change.

ID
7ac418856de04271
Source org
OpenAlex
Author
Not recorded
Published
Not recorded
OA status
Not recorded
DOI
10.1017/s1352465813000878
PMID
Not recorded
PMCID
Not recorded
Citations
Not recorded

Tags

Verification

Automated checks only, not clinical endorsement or advice.

Cite this entry

BibTeX

@article{allodium:7ac418856de04271,
  title = {Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence},
  journal = {OpenAlex},
  doi = {10.1017/s1352465813000878},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465813000878}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence
PB  - OpenAlex
DO  - 10.1017/s1352465813000878
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465813000878
ER  -

APA

Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence. (n.d.). OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465813000878

Related entries

More like this