Dismantling the relative effectiveness of core components of cognitive behavioural therapy in preventing depression in adolescents: protocol of a cluster randomized microtrial
Overview
This protocol outlines a cluster randomized microtrial designed to evaluate the relative effectiveness of four core CBT components and their sequencing for preventing depression in adolescents with elevated symptoms. The study involves high school students receiving different sequences of cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation, problem solving, and relaxation modules across multiple sites. It aims to identify potential moderators and mediators to inform the optimization and personalization of preventive CBT programs.
- ID
58ed6c7b509144e1- Source org
- PubMed Central
- Author
- Marieke W. H. van den Heuvel (Trimbos Institute), Denise Bodden (Radboud University Nijmegen), Mirjam Moerbeek (Utrecht University), Filip Smit (Trimbos Institute), Rutger C. M. E. Engels (Erasmus University Rotterdam)
- Published
- 2019-06-27
- OA status
- gold
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12888-019-2168-6
- PMID
- Not recorded
- PMCID
- Not recorded
- Citations
- 14
Tags
Verification
- identityok via crossref · score 1 · checked_at unknown
- legitimacykeep via unknown · score 1 · checked_at unknown
- linkok via http-check · 2026-07-21T15:52:31.592259+00:00
Cite this entry
BibTeX
@article{allodium:58ed6c7b509144e1,
title = {Dismantling the relative effectiveness of core components of cognitive behavioural therapy in preventing depression in adolescents: protocol of a cluster randomized microtrial},
author = {Marieke W. H. van den Heuvel and Denise Bodden and Mirjam Moerbeek and Filip Smit and Rutger C. M. E. Engels},
year = {2019},
journal = {PubMed Central},
doi = {10.1186/s12888-019-2168-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2168-6}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Dismantling the relative effectiveness of core components of cognitive behavioural therapy in preventing depression in adolescents: protocol of a cluster randomized microtrial AU - Heuvel, Marieke W. H. van den AU - Bodden, Denise AU - Moerbeek, Mirjam AU - Smit, Filip AU - Engels, Rutger C. M. E. PY - 2019 PB - PubMed Central DO - 10.1186/s12888-019-2168-6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2168-6 ER -
APA
Heuvel, M. W. H. V. D., Bodden, D., Moerbeek, M., Smit, F., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2019). Dismantling the relative effectiveness of core components of cognitive behavioural therapy in preventing depression in adolescents: protocol of a cluster randomized microtrial. PubMed Central. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2168-6
Related entries
- Evaluating Effect Moderators in Cognitive Versus Behavioral Based CBT-Modules and Sequences Towards Preventing Adolescent Depression
- The effectiveness of an adapted modular CBT training for youth with depressive symptoms: a study protocol for an n-of-1 trial
- Protocol for a randomized trial to predict the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions for symptoms of depression
- Cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation and cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of adult depression: A network meta-analysis.
- Mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy for depression in adolescents
- Cognitive behavioral therapy skills via a smartphone app for subthreshold depression among adults in the community: the RESiLIENT randomized controlled trial
- Predictors and outcomes of engagement in an online depression prevention program for final year secondary school students
- Brief internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural intervention for children and adolescents with symptoms of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomised controlled trial protocol
- Efficacy, moderators and mediators of cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP) versus behavioural activation (BA) in persistently depressed treatment-resistant inpatients: study protocol for the multicentre, randomised controlled changePDD trial
- Cognitive and Behavioral Skills Exercises Completed by Patients with Major Depression During Smartphone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial